Friday 26 October 2012

Decline in Profit due to high cost



‘BMW profits hit by higher cost’
Analysis 2



Introduction
If a company is highly valued and it achieves one of the highest revenues, does it always mean that the company is doing well? This article looks at BMW, a company that produces luxury goods that is highly valued by demands around the world and thus sales are high. However, even though the company is doing well in terms of satisfying demands and achieving high revenues how come its profits are falling? Referring to the article, BMW Company lists the factors that have been causing the decline in profits which includes, increased staff costs, higher spending on research and development and stiff competition. The quantity of BMW sold also varies in Europe, US and Asia and this directs us towards countries economic health.  
            The main aim for firms is to make profits. However, BMW has performed to the extent where it has attained consumers’ loyalty, recognition and value and the Company’s aim is not just in making profits but being the Company that achieves one of the highest profits. According to the article net profit dropped 28% compared to its previous year despite revenue rising up to 7% to 19.2bn Euros. With the given figures of 2012, it can be estimated that the previous year’s revenue could be about 17.9 Euros. 28% drop in net profit shows that this year’s total cost is much higher than the previous years.
            Stiff competition was one of the reasons BMW’s profits declined. Based on a factual account, BMW beats Mercedes Benz and Toyota in increasing sales of its luxury models in US in the fifth month of 2011. This evidence show that BMW’s revenues were higher than its competitors a year earlier and that might have lead them to producing higher quality products for the coming year to remain at that level and thus the Company inserted much more cost into producing higher standard good and that led to a drop in profit.
 .BMW increasing the price of goods to overcome high cost can however lead to significant impact. They might not lead in sales since the consumers may substitute to BMW’s competitor’s goods such as Mercedes Benz and Lexus which also has great brand loyalty. Based on a factual account, Mercedes U.S. sales rose 7% and extended its lead over BMW in US in September 2012. High cost of production led to BMW charging higher price and even though BMW achieved higher sales compared to its previous year it was defeated by Mercedes Benz. This could indicate that BMW revenues were higher than the previous year because of the higher price but Mercedes achieved more sales in terms of quantity because this luxurious good had a slightly fairer price. However, it can be argued that preference on the type of cars also influences demand because each the car brands has its unique characteristics and if consumers have had good experience with a particular car brand, they would prefer buying the same brand rather than substituting to another.  This shows that the demand for BMW is relatively elastic.


Increased staff cost and higher spending on research and development are the other factors that led to a fall in BMW’s profits fell. Staff cost rose 5% to 102,007. I believe that BMW recruited more high skilled workers and engineers to produce higher quality goods and that means paying higher and more salary and increasing expenditure on development and new technologies. Referring to the graph below, BMW still generates profit because its total revenue still exceeds the total cost but in this case, since its total cost is increasing, the profit is not at its maximum level (indicated by the arrow), but the points would be above the arrow showing the decline in profit because the total cost is increasing.
                        


Looking in terms of country’s economy, was it a good idea for BMW to increase their cost of production in order to produce higher quality products and increase its price? The first half of the year, sales in Europe were flat. They sold 437,338 units. On the other hand, sales in US boosted by 10% and in Asia by 25%. The company was warned the previous year that Europe’s economic and debt crisis could affect sales of cars but the company overlooked this issue and continued with their development plan.  The flat sales in Europe this year indicates that the company was affected by the crisis. Since most consumers in Europe could not afford to purchase the good at the price BMW was charging, it could be argued that BMW should not have carried on with their development plan and increase price of goods but however, BMW’s revenues were higher than the previous year which means that its development plan did benefit greatly from US and Asia. So BMW succeeded in terms of revenues but to overcome the drop in profit, they could charge higher but this could decrease demands and considering the economic crisis in Europe, they shouldn’t take further risk. A good suggestion for BMW to boost profit would be to lower their cost of production to some extent. This would still increase sales since BMW is already a highly valued company without them having to increase development. However, if the increase in development has great future benefits, they should proceed with it when Europe’s economy has improved since more people will be able to afford this luxury good.
           
Conclusion
Since BMW is a highly valued company, it has been performing greatly in terms of revenues. Although their revenues rose 7% from its previous year, their profit dropped by 28%. The fall in profit was due to high cost of production. BMW wanted to increase the standards of their good and charge higher price. The company’s high confidence emerged as a result of its outstanding performance in terms of sales and profit during the second quarter of its previous year. They were leading in terms of sales and to remain at that level they inserted much more cost into research and development and hiring more experts. The defeated Mercedes Benz in terms of sales in 2012 but was taken over by them in 2012. BMW however did achieve higher sales compared to its previous year but because of their high cost of production they charged higher and consumers substituted to Mercedes and thus more quantities were sold. BWM sales were also hit by European economic crises but they however still benefited highly from sales in US and Asia. To increase profit, they should decrease their cost of production for the time being and precede their development plan when Europe’s economy improves and people can purchase more of the good.
           



No comments:

Post a Comment